![]() I don't know what I'm grading here really, the game or the players, because none of the players are playing as with tactics, so that's really what's making the gameplay suck. People are running around all over the place, and it just seem so chaotic to me. It had promised a lot of realism, and that tactics should be vital, but it just isn't. WotR was disappointing when it came out, so I had sort of low expectations for this game, but even that didn't make this game playable :/. I don't know what I'm I am so disappointed with both this game and with WotR. I am so disappointed with both this game and with WotR. Final verdict: 4/10 I would buy it for $5, but any more than that, it is simply not worth it. You have to re-select your weapons every time you want to change a class. Lastly, the in-game class selection is TERRIBLE. Servers rotate game modes every game, so you have to leave and rejoin another server if you want to keep playing your favorite game mode. Cons: Slow, Unresponsive melee combat Terrible hitboxes Glaring imbalances Terrible archery system It doesn't matter if you use a piercing, blunt, or slashing weapon, the penetrate armor all the same. Game Modes: Chivalry posesses a lot of game modes. Ambiance: Battle cries echo the battlefield, screams of the dying are overwhelming, adding realism to the game. Pros: Gore and Brutality are very high in Chivalry, adding a sense of realism and depth to the game. It is a poor game, and honestly, War of the Roses beats it in almost every aspect. But it failed to deliver on most of the grounds promised. Gore and Brutality are very high in Chivalry, adding a sense of realism and depth to the game.Īmbiance: Battle cries echo the battlefield, screams of the dying are This game was on my watch list ever since I saw some footage of it. This game was on my watch list ever since I saw some footage of it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |